Verification Pipeline Context Management AI Agents Multi-Model AI Code Review Project Memory Kanban Board Power Users
Desktop App CLI VS Code Web
Pricing Docs FAQ Blog Roadmap Security Support
Mission Promise Community Contact Legal Sign In Try Mulu
Mulu Code Review

Review before you ship.

Mulu checks the diff, runs proof, and flags release risk before anyone touches the PR.

Screenshot placeholder: review panel showing diff, findings, and verification proof after the agent finishes.

Generated is not done.

Mulu turns fast AI output into reviewed releases.

checked Final diff, not the prompt

Reviews what actually shipped after the agent finishes.

mapped Context, not guesses

Findings reference real patterns and nearby files.

ready Proof attached

Browser runs and console state stay with each finding.

Catch expensive mistakes.

Mulu scans the risks that make fast builds slow after launch.

Screenshot placeholder: security finding + fix

Security risk

Flags secrets, unsafe IPC, auth bypass, and injection.

Screenshot placeholder: failed edge case + browser proof

Logic gaps

Finds missing states, races, and broken assumptions.

Screenshot placeholder: context map

Codebase fit

Checks local patterns before adding new abstractions.

Screenshot placeholder: performance trace

Performance

Calls out repeated work, blocking paths, and slow loops.

Screenshot placeholder: release checklist

Release readiness

Separates blockers from clean passes.

Screenshot placeholder: model comparison

Model choice

Pick Mulu Agent 1, Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, or consensus.

Less waiting. Less guessing.

60s Typical review Seconds, not days.
17 Models on tap Pick one or stack consensus.
100% Findings with proof Browser runs and console state.
0 Keys in client code Calls route through the Mulu proxy.

From agent to release.

1

Read

Checks the final diff after the agent.

2

Connect

Maps files, routes, stores, and deps.

3

Verify

Attaches browser runs and console state.

4

Explain

Shows what blocks release and why.

17 models. One review.

Mulu Agent 1 by default. Frontier models when it matters. Consensus when it really matters.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 1M context
GPT-5.4 Deep reasoning
Gemini 3.1 Pro Deep Think
Grok 4.2 2M context
Claude Opus 4.6 Heavy review
Consensus mode · stack three reviewers
Screenshot placeholder: proxy calls, audit trail, reviewed scope.

Private by default.

Reviews use real project context without exposing provider keys.

AI calls go through the Mulu proxy

Provider keys stay out of client code.

Every finding has an audit trail

Scope, model, proof, and outcome stay attached.

Teams can standardize review behavior

Shared workspaces keep review policy consistent.

Ship reviewed code.

Build faster. Keep the proof.

Try Mulu

Common questions.

Does this replace human code review?

No. It removes preventable issues before a teammate spends time on the diff. Humans still own product intent and final approval.

Can solo builders use it without a team?

Yes. It is useful when you are moving fast and need a second pass on security, logic, and release risk before shipping.

Can teams choose different models?

Yes. Use Mulu Agent 1 for cost-efficient review, choose a third-party model, or run consensus on sensitive changes.

Why switch from another coding tool?

Because Mulu sells the outcome, not just the generation. The change is written, reviewed, verified, and explained in one workflow.